Source: Corporate records
Stuart Olson Dominion contributed 62% of Churchill's 2011 consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 31% of 2011 EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment). Canem contributed 13% of Churchill's 2011 consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 29% of 2011 EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment). The Industrial Services segment contributed 25% of Churchill's 2011 consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 40% of 2011 EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment).
The following table sets out selected annual results by operating segment:
| ($millions except margin percent) | 2011 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | General Contracting | Commercial Systems | Industrial Services | Corporate and Other | Intersegment Eliminations | |||||||
| Contract revenue | $ | 1,409.2 | $ | 907.0 | $ | 192.7 | $ | 367.0 | $ | - | $ | (57.5) |
| Contract income | 157.9 | 62.1 | 46.2 | 49.5 | - | (0.1) | ||||||
| Contract income margin | 11.2% | 6.8% | 24.0% | 13.4% | ||||||||
| Indirect & administrative expense | 95.2 | 40.1 | 23.2 | 20.4 | 12.1 | (0.6) | ||||||
| EBITDA (1) | 72.0 | 26.2 | 24.0 | 33.4 | (12.1) | 0.5 | ||||||
| EBITDA margin | 7.2% | 8.0% | 14.6% | 8.2% | ||||||||
| EBT (1) | 32.6 | 22.4 | 21.8 | 27.8 | (39.5) | 0.1 | ||||||
| Backlog (1) | $ | 1,842.6 | $ | 1,445.3 | $ | 133.3 | $ | 264.0 | $ | - | $ | - |
| 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Total | General Contracting | Commercial Systems | Industrial Services | Corporate and Other | Intersegment Eliminations | |||||||
| Contract revenue | $ | 1,183.9 | $ | 817.3 | $ | 83.2 | $ | 301.2 | $ | - | $ | (17.8) |
| Contract income | 144.4 | 88.4 | 21.2 | 35.4 | - | (0.6) | ||||||
| Contract income margin | 12.2% | 10.8% | 25.5% | 11.8% | ||||||||
| Indirect & administrative expense | 78.4 | 34.2 | 8.7 | 12.9 | 24.6 | (2.1) | ||||||
| EBITDA (1) | 71.8 | 56.7 | 12.5 | 25.5 | (21.9) | (1.0) | ||||||
| EBITDA margin | 6.1% | 6.9% | 15.0% | 8.5% | ||||||||
| EBT (1) | 49.2 | 54.1 | 11.8 | 21.9 | (38.1) | (0.5) | ||||||
| Backlog (1) | $ | 1,555.0 | $ | 1,251.6 | $ | 127.4 | $ | 176.0 | $ | - | $ | - |
Note: (1) "EBT" is earnings from continuing operations before taxes. "EBITDA" is earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. "Backlog" is the total value of work that has not yet been completed that (a) is assessed by the Corporation as having high certainty of being performed by the Corporation or its subsidiaries by either the existence of a contract or work order specifying job scope, value and timing, or (b) has been awarded to the Corporation or its subsidiaries, as evidenced by an executed binding or non-binding letter of intent or agreement, describing the general job scope, value and timing of such work, and with the finalization of a formal contract respecting such work currently assessed by the Corporation as being reasonably assured. EBT, EBITDA and backlog are non-IFRS measures.
Stuart Olson Dominion contributed 56% of Churchill's 2012 first quarter consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 30% of 2012 first quarter EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment). Canem contributed 14% of Churchill's 2012 first quarter consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 28% of 2012 first quarter EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment). The Industrial Services segment contributed 30% of Churchill's 2012 first quarter consolidated revenue (excluding intersegment eliminations) and 42% of 2012 first quarter EBITDA (excluding intersegment eliminations and expenses of the Corporate and Other segment).
The following table sets out selected first quarter results by operating segment:
| ($millions except margin percent) | First Quarter, 2012 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | General Contracting | Commercial Systems | Industrial Services | Corporate and Other | Intersegment Eliminations | |||||||
| Contract revenue | $ | 333.2 | $ | 194.2 | $ | 46.6 | $ | 104.9 | $ | - | $ | (12.5) |
| Contract income | 35.7 | 13.0 | 10.5 | 10.6 | - | 1.6 | ||||||
| Contract incomemargin | 10.7% | 6.7% | 22.5% | 10.1% | - | - | ||||||
| Indirect & administrative expense | 26.4 | 9.6 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 5.3 | - | ||||||
| EBITDA (1) | 13.9 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 7.3 | (5.3) | 1.6 | ||||||
| EBITDA margin | 4.2% | 2.7% | 10.6% | 6.9% | - | - | ||||||
| EBT (1) | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 5.4 | (11.4) | 1.5 | ||||||
| Backlog (1) | $ | 1,751.5 | $ | 1,307.6 | $ | 204.4 | $ | 239.5 | $ | - | $ | - |
| First Quarter, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Total | General Contracting | Commercial Systems | Industrial Services | Corporate and Other | Intersegment Eliminations | |||||||
| Contract revenue | $ | 304.7 | $ | 207.7 | $ | 41.3 | $ | 64.2 | $ | - | $ | (8.7) |
| Contract income | 36.6 | 14.8 | 11.8 | 10.2 | - | (0.1) | ||||||
| Contract income margin | 12.0% | 7.1% | 28.4% | 15.9% | - | - | ||||||
| Indirect & administrative expense | 22.0 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 4.3 | - | ||||||
| EBITDA (1) | 17.2 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 6.3 | (4.3) | (0.1) | ||||||
| EBITDA margin | 5.6% | 4.4% | 15.1% | 9.8% | - | - | ||||||
| EBT (1) | 8.2 | 8.2 | 5.9 | 5.2 | (10.9) | (0.3) | ||||||
| Backlog (1)(2) | $ | 1,842.6 | $ | 1,445.3 | $ | 133.3 | $ | 264.0 | $ | - | $ | - |
Notes: (1) "EBT" is earnings from continuing operations before taxes. "EBITDA" is earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. "Backlog" is the total value of work that has not yet been completed that (a) is assessed by the Corporation as having high certainty of being performed by the Corporation or its subsidiaries by either the existence of a contract or work order specifying job scope, value and timing, or (b) has been awarded to the Corporation or its subsidiaries, as evidenced by an executed binding or non-binding letter of intent or agreement, describing the general job scope, value and timing of such work, and with the finalization of a formal contract respecting such work currently assessed by the Corporation as being reasonably assured. EBT, EBITDA and backlog are non-IFRS measures.
(2) As of December 31, 2011.